What type of evidence can support a claim that an applicant may still be at risk despite changed circumstances?

Supporting a claim that an applicant may still be at risk despite changed circumstances involves demonstrating a continued threat specifically related to the applicant's protected characteristics, such as race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. Evidence of continued threats is directly pertinent because it substantiates the argument that, despite any changes in the country conditions or circumstances, the applicant remains vulnerable due to persistent risks.

This type of evidence can include documented incidents of harm, threats received from individuals or groups, or government neglect or inability to protect the applicant from further persecution. By showing that the risk is ongoing and specifically connected to the applicant’s identity or beliefs, the evidence strengthens the asylum claim.

In contrast, testimony from friends and family might lack the objectivity or concrete details needed to affirm the ongoing risk. Statistical data on crime rates may not adequately address the specific nature of the threats faced by the applicant. Personal health documents might not be relevant to proving ongoing risk of persecution. Thus, evidence of continued threats on account of protected characteristics distinctly aligns with the legal standards for asylum claims.