What is the first step in addressing negative credibility concerning an applicant's testimony?

The first step in addressing negative credibility concerning an applicant's testimony is to determine if the concern is relevant to the applicant's eligibility. This process involves evaluating whether the specific issues raised about the applicant's credibility directly impact their eligibility for asylum. By assessing the relevance of the concerns, the officer can prioritize which aspects of the testimony need further exploration or explanation and ensure that the evaluation remains focused on essential criteria for asylum eligibility. This serves not only to streamline the officer’s analysis but also to ensure that any inquiry into credibility is pertinent and justified within the asylum determination context.

Understanding the relevance also helps in making informed decisions about the direction of the interview and whether further clarification or evidence is needed from the applicant. If the concerns are determined to be irrelevant, the officer can avoid unnecessary questioning or challenges that may not contribute to a fair evaluation of the case.